Launch Editor Here

Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

The DA 2166 9 1 form is an essential document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This evaluation report captures critical information about an NCO's performance, potential, and overall contributions during a specified period. Understanding how to accurately complete and utilize this form can significantly impact career progression and professional development within the military.

Launch Editor Here

Table of Contents

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant. This form serves multiple purposes, including the assessment of an NCO's performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. It is divided into several parts, beginning with administrative data that collects essential information such as the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or Department of Defense ID), rank, and unit details. The evaluation process involves multiple layers of authentication, requiring signatures from the rater, senior rater, and, if applicable, a supplementary reviewer. Each section of the form focuses on different aspects of the NCO's duties and performance, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Additionally, the form captures the NCO's physical fitness data and provides a framework for discussing the NCO's potential compared to peers. Understanding this form is vital for both the evaluators and the evaluated, as it plays a significant role in career progression and development within the Army.

Misconceptions

Here are four common misconceptions about the DA 2166-9-1 form:

Misconception 1: The form is only for negative evaluations.

Many people believe that the DA 2166-9-1 is used solely to document poor performance. In reality, it serves to evaluate both strengths and areas for improvement. It provides a comprehensive view of an NCO's performance.

Misconception 2: The NCO must agree with the evaluation to sign the form.

Some think that signing the form indicates agreement with the assessment. However, the signature simply confirms that the NCO has seen the report and that the administrative data is correct. It does not mean they agree with the evaluation.

Misconception 3: The form is optional for NCOs.

Another misconception is that completing the DA 2166-9-1 is optional. In fact, it is a mandatory part of the evaluation process for NCOs. It plays a crucial role in career progression and development.

Misconception 4: Only the rater influences the evaluation.

Some believe that only the rater's opinions matter. While the rater's assessment is important, the senior rater also plays a significant role. Their insights can impact the overall evaluation and potential assessments.

↓ Da 2166 9 1 PDF Form

Key takeaways

The DA 2166-9-1 form is essential for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Here are key takeaways for effectively filling out and utilizing this form:

Accurate Administrative Data: Ensure that all personal information in Part I, such as name, SSN, and rank, is correctly entered. This data forms the foundation of the evaluation.
Clear Duty Description: In Part III, provide a detailed description of the NCO's principal duties and responsibilities. This section should reflect the scope of their role, including any special emphasis areas.
Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, assess various attributes such as character, presence, and intellect. Each attribute should include comments that support the rating given, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation.
Rater and Senior Rater Signatures: Ensure that the rater and senior rater sign and date the form in Part II. Their signatures authenticate the evaluation process and confirm that the ratings reflect the NCO's performance accurately.
Understanding the Appeals Process: The rated NCO should acknowledge their understanding of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. This ensures transparency and provides a pathway for addressing any concerns regarding the evaluation.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it's essential to approach the task with care. Here are some do's and don'ts to keep in mind:

Do ensure all names are spelled correctly, including last, first, and middle initials.
Do verify that the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number is accurate.
Do provide a complete and clear description of daily duties and areas of special emphasis.
Do check that all email addresses end with .gov or .mil to ensure proper communication.
Do review the entire form for any missing information before submission.

Don't leave any sections blank; incomplete forms can lead to delays.
Don't use informal language or abbreviations that might confuse the reader.
Don't forget to sign and date the form where required.
Don't overlook the importance of the counseling dates; they must be accurate.
Don't submit the form without double-checking for any errors or omissions.

Da 2166 9 1 Preview

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3;; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-3

PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II - AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY		c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER	c3. RANK		PMOSC/	ORGANIZATION		DUTY ASSIGNMENT
REVIEW REQUIRED?		(Last, First, Middle Initial)			BRANCH
YES	NO

c4. COMMENTS		c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE		c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)			c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS
ENCLOSED?							(.gov or .mil)
YES	NO

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-9-1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)	SSN (or DOD ID No.)	THRU DATE